My Analysis of 6 Finest Third-Celebration Threat Administration Software program

A vendor will get breached. You discover out two weeks later. Now you are caught answering to management with nothing however an outdated spreadsheet and a half-finished threat rating.No one desires that. That’s why I evaluated over 15 platforms to search out the greatest third-party threat administration (TPRM) software program for 2025: instruments that detect points early, automate assessments, and maintain vendor threat below management with out chasing paperwork.

And the information backs its use case. In response to the 2025 Venminder State of Third-Celebration Threat Administration Survey, 87% of organizations imagine there’s worth in investing in TPRM actions. Moreover, 64% are already utilizing devoted platforms to do it. That type of consensus exhibits how vital these instruments have grow to be for threat, compliance, and procurement groups alike.

The six platforms that made this checklist stood out for his or her automation, versatile frameworks, and talent to help every little thing from safety audits to procurement-led opinions. Whether or not you’re dealing with 20 distributors or 200, these instruments are constructed that can assist you keep compliant with out slowing the enterprise down.

What makes third-party threat administration software program price it?

Threat doesn’t cease after onboarding. A vendor may cross the preliminary checks however fall out of compliance six months later, and for those who don’t catch it, your workforce is on the hook.

That’s what makes third-party threat administration software program well worth the funding. It’s not nearly organizing vendor information; it’s about staying knowledgeable. The suitable platform helps you see modifications in vendor threat early, automate follow-ups, and keep away from surprises throughout audits or board opinions.

It additionally saves time. As an alternative of chasing standing updates throughout departments, TPRM software program provides you a shared system for assessments, scoring, and approvals. Which means fewer delays, clearer accountability, and fewer room for issues to slide by way of the cracks.

What I prioritized when evaluating third-party vendor threat administration software program 

Not each platform that claims to handle vendor threat is constructed for the real-world stress that comes with it. I thought of the next elements when evaluating the very best third-party threat administration software program.

• Steady threat monitoring: It’s not sufficient to evaluate a vendor as soon as and transfer on. I regarded for TPRM platforms that provide ongoing visibility. Instruments that observe modifications in a vendor’s safety posture, monetary well being, or compliance standing and set off alerts when one thing shifts had been excessive on my checklist.
• Automated assessments and follow-ups: Questionnaires are unavoidable, however they shouldn’t be a bottleneck. I prioritized platforms that allow you to automate preliminary assessments, ship reminders, and rating distributors based mostly on pre-set standards. This helps groups transfer sooner whereas nonetheless documenting every little thing for audit readiness.
• Integration with compliance frameworks: Whether or not you are managing GDPR, HIPAA, SOC 2, or ISO 27001, mapping vendor information to compliance controls is essential. I regarded for instruments that provide native help for frequent frameworks or make it simple to construct your individual mapping system.
• Threat scoring and tiering flexibility: Not all distributors carry the identical threat, and your software program ought to mirror that. I gave desire to TPRM instruments that enable for configurable scoring fashions, tiering logic, and conditional workflows based mostly on vendor kind, geography, or service criticality.
• Collaboration and possession monitoring: Vendor threat isn’t owned by one workforce. I regarded for platforms that help cross-functional collaboration between procurement, safety, authorized, and compliance, with clear process possession and standing visibility inbuilt.
• Scalability and value: The very best third-party threat administration platforms include clear interfaces, customizable dashboards, and versatile deployment fashions that may help small groups or scale with rising vendor ecosystems.

The checklist under accommodates real person opinions from the Third-party & Provider Threat Administration Software program class web page. To be included on this class, an answer should:

• Embrace normal workflows and templates to evaluate and consider a variety of third-party dangers, together with monetary, authorized, strategic, reputational, moral, info safety, operational, cybersecurity, environmental, and geopolitical dangers
• Embrace normal studies on third-party threat publicity
• Remediate third-party dangers in alignment with inner insurance policies
• Monitor ongoing vendor efficiency and any third-party threat modifications

*This information was pulled from G2 in 2025. Some opinions could have been edited for readability.

UpGuard is a third-party threat administration platform that helps organizations monitor and consider vendor safety posture at scale. In response to G2 Information, it’s mostly utilized in monetary companies, IT companies, and software program, with nearly all of customers coming from mid-market (37%) and enterprise (55%) firms.

One in every of UpGuard’s mostly talked about advantages is the visibility it offers into vendor safety. Reviewers mentioned the platform helped them keep forward of vulnerabilities by highlighting expired certificates, DNS points, and different potential exposures throughout their provide chain. This made it simpler to evaluate which distributors posed essentially the most threat and required quick consideration.

UpGuard’s automated threat scoring was one other standout. A number of customers appreciated that the device may rapidly consider and rank distributors based mostly on exterior threat indicators, making it simpler to prioritize their assessment course of. Groups managing a big quantity of distributors discovered this particularly priceless throughout onboarding and periodic reassessments.

Buyer help additionally earned constant reward. Many G2 customers described the help workforce as responsive, educated, and straightforward to work with. A number of highlighted onboarding experiences the place UpGuard’s workforce helped information them by way of implementation and provided tailor-made recommendation for setup and greatest practices.

The interface itself was usually described as intuitive and straightforward to navigate. Reviewers famous that even workforce members with no technical background may rapidly perceive the best way to view vendor threat scores and drill into particular points. The readability of the dashboard was regularly highlighted as one of many platform’s high usability strengths.

That mentioned, just a few areas stood out as limitations for some groups. Whereas the built-in questionnaire device helped simplify elements of the evaluation course of, a number of reviewers discovered it restrictive when attempting to tailor inquiries to particular distributors or compliance necessities. The shortage of flexibility created further work in instances the place customized inputs had been wanted, although groups working standardized assessments appeared much less affected.

Customization additionally got here up as a standard request. Some customers wished extra management over how threat scores had been calculated or how notifications had been configured for various threat occasions. The built-in scoring logic labored nicely for common vendor opinions, however groups in extremely regulated industries or with distinctive threat fashions discovered themselves wishing for extra flexibility. Nonetheless, most agreed that the default setup supplied a strong basis for monitoring exterior threat throughout a rising vendor base.

UpGuard is a robust match for mid-market and enterprise groups that need exterior threat monitoring and clear visibility into third-party safety posture, with out sacrificing ease of use or help high quality.

What I dislike about UpGuard:

• Whereas the device was useful for standardized workflows, some G2 customers felt the questionnaire module didn’t provide sufficient flexibility when attempting to customise assessments for various vendor tiers.
• With customization, reviewers wished extra flexibility in configuring alerts, scoring logic, and workflows. That mentioned, most felt the out-of-the-box setup nonetheless gave them a strong basis to scale vendor threat applications successfully.

What G2 customers dislike about UpGuard:

“What we dislike at present with UpGuard is the limitation to have a number of relationship questionnaires. As a company that has a number of enterprise models, we considered another for now to proceed with the implementation.”

– UpGuard Evaluation, Ghel E.

Vanta is extensively identified for its governance, safety, and compliance (GRC) automation capabilities. Whereas it is not constructed solely for vendor threat administration, many G2 customers depend on it to convey third-party visibility into their compliance applications. In response to G2 Information, Vanta is mostly utilized by small companies (50%) and mid-market firms (48%), with adoption concentrated in software program, IT companies, and monetary companies.

Reviewers regularly highlighted Vanta’s automation capabilities. Duties like vendor discovery, proof assortment, doc evaluation, and threat scoring may all be dealt with with minimal guide enter. Vanta AI performed an enormous function right here, serving to groups save time by responding to safety questions and triggering follow-ups robotically.

The questionnaire builder additionally earned reward for dashing up assessments. Some groups used the built-in templates, whereas others most popular crafting their very own varieties. In both case, reviewers felt the device made it simpler to get the best solutions rapidly when evaluating distributors throughout completely different threat tiers.

Usability stood out as one other robust level. Many reviewers described the interface as clear and intuitive, permitting each technical and non-technical stakeholders to collaborate on duties like vendor opinions, compliance checks, and audit prep with no need fixed help.

Moreover, Vanta’s rising community of Belief Facilities helped customers confirm first-party information straight from their distributors, making it simpler to validate safety claims, minimize down on back-and-forth, and preserve a extra correct, up-to-date view of third-party threat.

Most reviewers felt Vanta provided strong worth out of the field, particularly for core compliance wants. That mentioned, pricing got here up as a sticking level for some. A couple of customers famous that superior options, like enhanced vendor workflows or added automation, required higher-tier plans, which may stretch budgets for smaller groups. Even so, the truth that half of Vanta’s G2 reviewers come from small companies means that many groups nonetheless discover the platform accessible and well worth the funding.

Integrations drew some blended reactions. Whereas customers appreciated the variety of out there connectors, just a few talked about that setup wasn’t all the time plug-and-play and generally wanted further help. As soon as configured, although, most discovered the integrations reliable for syncing audit and vendor information.

Regardless of these gaps, most agreed that Vanta provided a robust basis for scaling vendor compliance, notably for firms rising their GRC capabilities alongside third-party oversight.

What I dislike about Vanta:

• Whereas many customers discovered long-term worth in Vanta’s automation, some felt the pricing was a bit steep for smaller groups simply getting began.
• The vary of integrations was appreciated, however just a few reviewers mentioned the preliminary setup wasn’t as clean as they anticipated and sometimes wanted further help.

What G2 customers dislike about Vanta:

“Whereas Vanta simplifies core compliance duties, we’d prefer to see deeper remediation steering, extra intuitive help for vendor threat monitoring, and expanded metrics for govt reporting. Enhancing cross-framework mapping and providing higher controls for AI coverage governance would additionally improve its long-term worth.”

– Vanta Evaluation, Rajat R.

Descartes Denied Celebration Screening helps organizations display screen suppliers, companions, and different third events in opposition to international watchlists to remain compliant with commerce rules. Based mostly on G2 Information, it’s most generally utilized in extremely regulated industries like aviation, aerospace, and protection, with 32% of reviewers from mid-market firms and 52% from enterprise organizations.

One of the constant strengths reviewers talked about is the platform’s screening accuracy. Many customers mentioned Descartes made it simpler to vet suppliers in opposition to denied occasion lists and international sanctions databases, serving to them decrease threat throughout onboarding or ongoing due diligence.

This accuracy was additional amplified by automation. As an alternative of manually monitoring entries throughout a number of lists, customers described how Descartes runs steady background checks that flag potential dangers with out disrupting workflows. For groups managing giant vendor volumes, this automated screening helped cut back errors whereas saving vital time.

Actual-time alerts had been one other recurring spotlight. A number of customers famous how rapidly the system flagged dangers, giving compliance and commerce groups sufficient time to reply earlier than a transaction progressed. And with built-in ERP and commerce system integrations, Descartes was capable of ship these alerts as a part of customers’ current workflows.

Assist additionally earned reward. Many famous that the workforce was fast to help with configuration questions and helped customers confidently navigate the extra complicated elements of denied occasion screening.

Having mentioned that, just a few reviewers identified that false positives had been a recurring problem. In some instances, overly delicate matching logic triggered pointless investigations, particularly when working with international entities that had related names. Nonetheless, customers appreciated that match rule thresholds might be fine-tuned with assist from help to scale back these occurrences.

A couple of others talked about that the interface felt dated and might be extra intuitive for first-time customers, although they acknowledged that after the system was configured, it ran easily with minimal intervention.

Descartes Denied Celebration Screening is a robust match for compliance and threat groups in regulated industries who want dependable watchlist protection, responsive help, and automatic screening workflows to attenuate third-party publicity.

What I dislike about Descartes Denied Celebration Screening:

• Some G2 reviewers famous that the device often returned false positives, which added just a few further steps to their assessment course of.
• Others talked about that whereas the interface acquired the job accomplished, it felt barely dated in comparison with newer platforms.

What G2 customers dislike about Descartes Denied Celebration Screening:

“The benefit of use is the place it nonetheless lags. The interface feels outdated, and it’s not all the time clear the place to go for sure features except you’re utilizing it day by day. Since our workforce makes use of it just a few occasions every week reasonably than day by day, we regularly discover ourselves re-learning steps or referring again to inner notes. Whereas implementation help was respectable, the onboarding documentation may’ve been clearer. Buyer help is usually useful and responsive, although it generally takes a follow-up to get an in depth reply.”

– Descartes Denied Celebration Screening Evaluation, Shane D.

Secureframe is greatest identified for serving to groups keep audit-ready, however G2 customers additionally depend on it to handle vendor threat extra confidently. In response to G2 Information, Secureframe is primarily adopted by small companies (65%) and mid-market firms (31%), mostly in laptop science, IT companies, and monetary companies.

From what I gathered in opinions, one in every of Secureframe’s most appreciated options is its centralized vendor dashboard. Customers talked about having the ability to entry every little thing from vendor profiles and evaluation outcomes to hooked up paperwork and historical past logs in a single tab. For groups managing a number of distributors, this visibility appeared to make an enormous distinction.

I additionally noticed a number of reward for the platform’s steady monitoring capabilities. A number of customers highlighted how Secureframe helps flag unapproved companies accessed through SSO, catching shadow IT distributors earlier than they slip by way of the cracks. Many additionally talked about establishing recurring vendor opinions, tiered by threat stage, with duties and notifications routed by way of instruments like Slack and Jira. That automation felt notably priceless for fast-moving groups attempting to maintain up with coverage checks.

One other function that stood out was Comply AI, which helps extract related responses straight from vendor paperwork like SOC 2 studies or safety insurance policies. The platform then pre-fills safety questionnaires with prompt solutions, giving groups a head begin on vendor evaluations whereas saving hours on guide opinions.

Ease of use got here up regularly as nicely. Reviewers throughout technical and non-technical roles mentioned Secureframe made it simple to navigate audits, assessments, and vendor workflows with no need in depth onboarding. I additionally noticed a number of mentions of a useful and responsive help workforce, which added to the general ease of adoption.

That mentioned, just a few G2 customers famous restricted flexibility in vendor administration workflows, notably when attempting to tailor processes for various provider tiers. Others wished the questionnaire module provided extra customization choices, like dynamic scoring or conditional logic, to raised match complicated threat necessities. Nonetheless, most reviewers felt Secureframe provided a strong basis for vendor threat monitoring, particularly for groups earlier of their third-party governance journey.

In case you’re searching for an accessible but succesful TPRM answer that mixes automation, AI help, and ongoing monitoring, Secureframe is price contemplating.

What I dislike about Secureframe:

• Some G2 reviewers felt the questionnaire module was slightly inflexible, particularly when customizing assessments for various vendor varieties.
• A couple of G2 opinions additionally talked about restricted flexibility in how vendor workflows had been structured and managed.

What G2 customers dislike about Secureframe:

“Though the platform addresses nearly all of our necessities, the sheer variety of options is usually a bit daunting initially. It might be useful if there have been a better technique to prioritize or cover options that are not wanted, as this might make it simpler for brand spanking new customers to rise up to hurry extra rapidly.”

– Secureframe Evaluation, Bryan R.

IBM OpenPages is an enterprise-grade GRC platform that features strong help for third-party threat administration. In response to G2 Information, it’s mostly adopted in industries like laptop software program, IT companies, and monetary companies, with most customers coming from small (37%) and mid-sized companies (43%).

A number of reviewers appreciated how configurable the platform was concerning vendor threat processes. I learn in opinions that groups had been capable of adapt workflows to match their very own inner insurance policies, regulatory wants, and most popular scoring methodologies. This flexibility prolonged into how customers tracked threat severity, mitigation plans, and associated points throughout vendor relationships, permitting for extra detailed threat modeling with out forcing a one-size-fits-all construction.

OpenPages helps groups handle your entire vendor questionnaire course of in a single place, from creating assessments to sending reminders and reviewing responses. A number of customers mentioned this diminished the guide back-and-forth and made it simpler to remain constant throughout distributors. The power to attain responses additionally supplied groups with a clearer technique to consider third-party threat and determine who to work with.

One other key theme I seen was how helpful the reporting and dashboard options had been for large-scale visibility. Some customers mentioned they might group distributors by geography, tier, or enterprise unit, which made it simpler to identify patterns or examine particular points. This was useful for firms dealing with many third events, the place having a centralized view of vendor hierarchies and threat metrics made oversight less complicated.

By way of technical functionality, OpenPages was additionally famous for its integrations. It will possibly join with each enterprise and exterior techniques to tug in vendor information, serving to consolidate third-party info right into a unified repository. That consolidation gave customers a clearer image of their complete vendor panorama and improved effectivity in areas like onboarding and efficiency monitoring.

The educational curve did come up as a tradeoff in a number of opinions. Whereas G2 customers valued the platform’s depth, they famous that it required some ramp-up time, particularly for these with out prior expertise in threat or compliance techniques. Regardless of that, most agreed the trouble was worthwhile as soon as groups turned aware of the system.

Pricing was one other space the place opinions diversified barely. A couple of reviewers discovered the fee to be comparatively excessive for smaller groups. Even so, it appears many firms continued to depend on OpenPages for its long-term scalability and the extent of management it gives for vendor threat administration.

In case you’re seeking to construct a mature, centralized program for monitoring vendor threat, IBM OpenPages gives a excessive diploma of customization, robust technical integrations, and help for complicated third-party governance.

What I dislike about IBM OpenPages:

• Some opinions famous that getting on top of things may take time, primarily for groups new to GRC platforms. That mentioned, most agreed the flexibleness and depth made the training worthwhile as soon as they acquired going.
• A couple of customers famous that the pricing felt slightly excessive in comparison with how usually they used the platform. Nonetheless, many felt the worth aligned nicely with the capabilities provided.

What G2 customers dislike about IBM OpenPages:

“The price is excessive as in comparison with different GRC instruments, and there are some hurdles in person adoption.”

– IBM OpenPages Evaluation, Vishal D. 

D&B Threat Analytics allows groups to judge provider threat and make extra knowledgeable selections utilizing a mixture of proprietary information and built-in workflows. In response to G2 Information, the platform is used most frequently by professionals in IT companies, accounting, and insurance coverage, spanning small companies (25%) to enterprise groups (36%), with the most important phase coming from mid-market firms (38%).

What stood out to me within the opinions was how a lot customers valued the entry to deep provider intelligence. Many mentioned the platform gave them the type of monetary and operational perception they couldn’t simply discover elsewhere: AI-driven proprietary threat scores, UNSPSC, parent-child info, and environmental, social, and governance (ESG).

Talking of the platform’s means to determine provider dangers and AI-generated threat scores, the device additionally gives SER, SSI, and PAYDEX as key sources for detecting pink flags and rating distributors by publicity ranges. The sort of intelligence is especially priceless for groups managing giant provider networks.

One other usually praised function is the platform’s automated screening workflows. As an alternative of counting on guide processes, customers described a guided, five-step process that helps determine high-risk suppliers by checking sanctions lists, antagonistic media, and extra. A couple of reviewers additionally highlighted enhanced screening choices like Final Useful Possession (UBO) information, which offers a further layer of element when vetting complicated provider relationships.

G2 customers additionally talked about how simple it was to get began with the platform. I got here throughout a number of mentions of quick implementation and minimal technical raise. It appeared like customers had been capable of arrange monitoring, configure dashboards, and begin monitoring threat with little or no hand-holding. One thing I think about is a large plus for stretched procurement or threat groups.

I additionally noticed belief within the information. Many reviewers mentioned the depth and accuracy of D&B’s international database made them really feel extra ready throughout provider opinions and audits. Some talked about that having alerts and monitoring tied to real-time information helped them catch points, like credit score dips or authorized pink flags, earlier than they turned actual issues.

That mentioned, some G2 customers identified challenges with information protection in sure areas, notably in rising markets. I learn that provider profiles for personal or newer companies had been usually sparse or lacking altogether. In some instances, customers reported false positives or duplicate entries that made it more durable to belief the automated flags. These limitations didn’t outweigh the advantages for many groups, however they did spotlight the significance of cross-checking insights earlier than taking motion.

Some reviewers additionally mentioned that pricing felt a bit excessive, notably for smaller groups. Even so, the platform nonetheless appears to strike steadiness, with customers throughout completely different firm sizes discovering worth in its capabilities.

D&B Threat Analytics is a robust choice for firms that need dependable provider information, quick implementation, and a platform that scales with threat and procurement wants.

What I dislike about D&B Threat Analytics:

• Some customers famous that provider information was extra restricted in sure areas, primarily for rising markets, however nonetheless discovered the platform dependable for almost all of their vendor base.
• A couple of reviewers talked about that the pricing might be a stretch for smaller groups or occasional use instances, although many nonetheless felt the platform delivered robust worth total.

What G2 customers dislike about D&B Threat Analytics:

“Whereas I haven’t got private opinions, some customers might need considerations with D&B Threat Analytics, corresponding to excessive prices, a steep studying curve on account of its complexity, potential over-reliance on information, restricted protection in sure industries or areas, and challenges with integration into current techniques.”

– D&B Threat Analytics Evaluation, Abhishek Kumar Y.

In case you’re pondering past vendor threat, right here’s our information to the greatest GRC instruments to finish the image.