Monday, August 4, 2025

I Tried GitHub Copilot vs. ChatGPT for Coding: What I Discovered


GitHub Copilot vs. ChatGPT selecting between them is like selecting a journey information vs. a GPS — each useful, however for various sorts of coders. GitHub Copilot is sort of a journey information already conversant in the highway and shortcuts. It is ultimate when you recognize the place you’re going and need to pace issues up. 

Then again, ChatGPT is your GPS, supplying you with clear instructions step-by-step and explaining the highway forward.

As a no-coder and a productiveness geek, I spent weeks placing each instruments to the check. To see how two standard AI instruments stack up in real-life conditions, I devised seven coding duties: constructing a to-do listing net app, fixing a JavaScript logical error, creating a private portfolio touchdown web page, implementing a search algorithm, growing a climate dashboard, producing inspirational quotes, and designing a shade palette creator. 

These duties centered on sensible coding challenges and inventive problem-solving. By placing them to the check throughout these duties, we’ll discover which instruments stand out because the greatest AI code era software program

To maintain issues honest, I gave each instruments the identical prompts, with no adjustments in any respect. My purpose was easy: I wished to search out out which device does a greater job at what and who may profit from utilizing every one.

Here’s what I discovered: GitHub Copilot shines at dashing up the coding course of by providing sensible autocomplete strategies instantly throughout the IDE. In the meantime, ChatGPT excels at producing structured code and may also educate you ways and the place to make use of it whereas clarifying any doubts you may need.

Notice: Each GitHub (a Microsoft subsidiary) and OpenAI steadily roll out new updates to those AI coding assistants. The small print under mirror essentially the most present capabilities as of June 2025 however could change over time.

GitHub Copilot vs. ChatGPT: What’s totally different and what’s not?

GitHub Copilot and ChatGPT are each a number of the greatest AI coding assistants on the market, however they serve very totally different roles in the way you write, debug, and ship code. GitHub Copilot whispers strategies instantly into your IDE, whereas ChatGPT is your brainstorming companion within the chat window.

Just lately, GitHub Copilot’s chatbot has expanded past OpenAI fashions to incorporate different AI fashions, making it much more highly effective. Let’s dig into how they evaluate and their shared strengths. 

GitHub Copilot vs. ChatGPT: The variations

GitHub Copilot is a centered coding device inside your editor that lets you full code as you kind. ChatGPT is a versatile AI assistant that helps with coding, planning, studying, and extra. GitHub Copilot speeds issues up, whereas ChatGPT explains and guides. Each are highly effective, however constructed for various sorts of workflows.

  • Main use case:  GitHub Copilot is a specialised AI device centered completely on code completion. It really works inside your code editor, suggesting and finishing code shortly based mostly in your writing. This device is designed for builders who need to code sooner. Then again, ChatGPT is a flexible, general-purpose AI assistant designed to assist with numerous duties, together with coding, planning, debugging, studying, and documentation. It’s particularly helpful for non-coders, solo builders, or anybody constructing tasks who want detailed explanations, steering, or brainstorming alongside coding help. GitHub Copilot permits superior codex options just for paid customers, whereas ChatGPT gives free tiers with coding help and extra capabilities in its paid plans.
  • Studying and explainability:  Copilot doesn’t clarify; it simply completes. It’s good should you already know what you might be doing. ChatGPT can clarify code line-by-line, generate tutorials, and even stroll you thru ideas with analogies.
  • AI fashions and processing energy: Each instruments use superior OpenAI fashions, however in numerous methods. GitHub Copilot is a fine-tuned variant of GPT-4 and in addition helps different fashions like Claude and Google’s Gemini 2.5 professional. ChatGPT Plus, then again, provides you entry to GPT-4o, a multimodal agent able to complicated reasoning, debugging, and file evaluation.
  • Context consciousness: GitHub Copilot can work inside your IDE and pulls real-time context from the file you are enhancing and close by code, making it sharper for inline strategies and dwell coding assist. ChatGPT can progress massive chunks of code throughout a number of information or uploads, making it nice for deep debugging, structure evaluations, and entire mission reasoning should you feed the inputs manually. So, whereas Copilot feels extra speedy and seamless throughout lively improvement, ChatGPT gives a broader context.

GitHub Copilot vs. ChatGPT: Key similarities

Regardless of their totally different kinds, these instruments have so much in widespread, and when used collectively, they are often surprisingly complementary. 

  • Contextual code completion: Each can generate strains, features, and code blocks that cut back guide typing and repetitive work.
  • Multilingual programming help: Python, JavaScript, HTML, CSS, SQL, Go, and extra. They each deal with a variety of recent programming languages.
  • Productiveness and studying: Whether or not you might be constructing or troubleshooting, each instruments make it easier to write higher code sooner and study as you go.
  • Powered by Codex: Each GitHub Copilot and ChatGPT make the most of OpenAI’s Codex. Which might carry out a wide range of developer-focused duties for you, equivalent to writing new options, answering questions on your codebase, fixing bugs, and even proposing pull requests for evaluation. 

How I in contrast GitHub Copilot vs. ChatGPT: My prompts and analysis standards 

To completely evaluate, I run the identical prompts independently on each instruments in coding eventualities, utilizing their paid variations (Copilot Professional and ChatGPT Plus). I examined them utilizing the next duties. 

  • Fundamental net improvement: To-do listing net app, private portfolio touchdown web page
  • Debugging and error decision: Fixing a logical error
  • Algorithm implementation: Search implementation
  • Information mind: Climate dashboard
  • Artistic coding: Inspirational quote generator, shade palette creator

I evaluated their response based mostly on

  • Accuracy: Is the code logically sound, right, and related to the immediate?
  • Creativity:  Does the output really feel authentic, visually participating, or thoughtfully designed (particularly in UI/net duties)?
  • Effectivity: Is the response clearly structured, concise, and fast to implement?
  • Usability:  Can the output be used as-is, or with minimal edits and debugging?

So as to add different person views, I additionally cross-checked my findings with G2 evaluations to see how different customers expertise these fashions.

Disclaimer: AI responses could fluctuate based mostly on phrasing, session historical past, and system updates for a similar prompts. These outcomes mirror the fashions’ capabilities on the time of testing.

GitHub Copilot vs. ChatGPT: How they really carried out in my checks 

In case you are all the way in which right here, I’m guessing you might be simply as curious as I used to be to search out out which device got here out on high. I’ll stroll you thru how I examined each instruments, what the expertise was like, and the way I’ve damaged down my verdict to make it straightforward (and hopefully enjoyable) to observe.

  • What stood out? I’ll spotlight the strengths, weaknesses, and any surprises (good and dangerous) I seen from each instruments. 
  • Who did it higher? I’ll let you know which AI got here out on high based mostly on accuracy, creativity, effectivity, and the way straightforward it was to make use of the output.
  • Remaining verdict: I’ll share my trustworthy tackle which AI is a more sensible choice for a selected activity.

Prepared? Let’s go!

1. To-do listing net app

I wished to construct a easy to-do listing net app to check how GitHub Copilot and ChatGPT dealt with on a regular basis coding duties.

GitHub Copilot stunned me with a modern, minimal design. It routinely break up the code into separate HTML, CSS, and JS information, making issues a lot cleaner and simpler to handle. The structured format felt extra maintainable in the long term. 

VersionA1-ezgif.com-speed

ChatGPT returned a neat single-file demo with colourful buttons and a pleasant interface. Nonetheless, I felt ChatGPT’s response, having all of the HTML, CSS, and JavaScript bundled collectively, was a bit cluttered as soon as I considered extending the app later.

Winner: GitHub Copilot 

Not everybody needs to put in writing code, and that is okay! For individuals who favor drag-and-drop magic over typing instructions, take a look at these high no-code platforms that make constructing apps a breeze.

2. Private portfolio touchdown web page

Making a portfolio is widespread for rookies who’re engaged on real-world tasks. I’ve wished to construct a portfolio website for myself, so this was an ideal alternative to place my abilities to the check. 

VersionB2-ezgif.com-speed

GitHub began sturdy, particularly with CSS separated into its file for simpler future updates. However in comparison with ChatGPT, Copilot’s design felt less complicated and lacked necessary options, like mission playing cards and detailed navigation, parts that make a portfolio really showcase your work and have interaction guests.

VersionA2-ezgif.com-speed

ChatGPT’s answer, then again, felt easy proper from the beginning. Every part got here out properly, like displaying all sections, navigation, mission playing cards, and the contact type — precisely as anticipated, with out errors. Having mission playing cards included was notably useful since portfolios sometimes want this function.

Winner: ChatGPT

3. JavaScript logical error

For this check, I gave each instruments a typical JS bug, utilizing the task operator (=) as a substitute of the equality verify (===) inside a conditional assertion. This bug journeys up many rookies, so I wished to see not simply if they might repair it but additionally how they defined the answer. 

JavaScript logical error

GitHub Copilot’s repair was equally efficient in fixing the issue, nevertheless it simply noticed the error and rectified it. I discovered the reason a bit repetitive. As a newbie, I nonetheless wouldn’t have understood why the error occurred with out extra context. 
So, in my case, I felt GitHub Copilot’s clarification fell brief. There was nothing technically flawed, however these minor distractions stood out.

Version A (3)

ChatGPT’s correction felt easy and concise. It shortly pinpointed the error and clearly defined why the bug occurred, and instantly confirmed the corrected code. Then, it wrapped the whole lot up with a one-line abstract that even somebody new to coding may observe. ChatGPT gave me each the what and why with out overwhelming me.

ChatGPT’s extra exact clarification and easy presentation made it really feel barely simpler to observe, particularly for rookies on the lookout for a simple reply.

Winner: ChatGPT 

G2 person score: Which AI coding assistant excels in accuracy?

GitHub Copilot: 8.4/10

ChatGPT: 8.5/10

 

ChatGPT scores barely increased than GitHub Copilot on G2, highlighting ChatGPT’s superior precision for coding duties.

4. Search algorithm

I requested each GitHub Copilot and ChatGPT to match the implementation of the JavaScript binary search operate to see which felt simpler and extra sensible to make use of. Binary search is a type of foundational algorithms that each coder runs into sooner or later.

It is a quick strategy to discover a particular merchandise in a sorted listing, one thing that comes up typically in technical interviews and real-world tasks. I wished to see if they might write it appropriately and the way clearly they defined it.

search algorithm using github copilot

GitHub Copilot supplied a concise and environment friendly tackle iterative binary search. The operate was well-structured, and its temporary inline feedback conveyed its function. I appreciated the way it delivered simply what was wanted, no additional content material or extended explanations.  

VERSIONA4-ezgif.com-speed

In distinction, the ChatGPT answer was additionally right and simple to observe. The inline feedback have been useful, making the logic straightforward to know shortly. Nonetheless, I felt the reason was overly in depth and created pointless scrolling once I simply wished a fast reference. 

Winner: GitHub Copilot

G2 person score: Which AI coding assistant is greatest when it comes to code high quality?

GitHub Copilot: 8.8/10

ChatGPT: 8.8/10

 

Each GitHub Copilot and ChatGPT have glorious person scores on G2. This exhibits that customers discover each instruments equally sturdy at producing clear, dependable, and maintainable code. 

 

Check out the very best AI code turbines, my colleague Sudipto Paul personally examined and reviewed. 

5. Climate dashboard

I wished to construct a small weather-themed UI as a newbie mission, one thing easy, visible, and simple to customise later. I specified that the dashboard ought to present climate knowledge for international places, and requested for primary options like temperature, climate situation, and an icon representing the present climate.

VersionB5-ezgif.com-speed

Like all the opposite responses, GitHub Copilot put HTML, CSS, and JS in separate information. It felt manner cleaner, particularly once I wished to alter colours or fonts. The design additionally has a gradient background, and climate emojis make it really feel extra polished.

VersionA5-ezgif.com-speed

ChatGPT felt like opening a snack pack — only one HTML file to repeat and open. It was straightforward to tweak, however discovering type guidelines buried within the HTML was difficult. Nonetheless, it labored out of the field and didn’t break. The design was good sufficient, with a pastel card format that, whereas primary, regarded first rate. 

Winner: Cut up; GitHub Copilot made future edits manner simpler, whereas ChatGPT made it straightforward to arrange with only one code.

6. Inspirational quote generator

This time, I simply wished the instruments to say good issues to me! Testing quote turbines gave the impression of a chill strategy to discover instruments. One nailed the vibe; the opposite one wanted a pep discuss.

VersionB6-ezgif.com-speed

GitHub Copilot regarded good with an orange gradient and powerful shadows. Clicking labored properly and added a pleasant fade impact, however generally, it repeated the precise quotes, which broke the expertise a bit. So, for a newbie, ChatGPT made me smile sooner.

VersionA6-ezgif.com-speed

ChatGPT was able to go the second I entered the immediate. There aren’t any lacking hyperlinks or clean screens; it really works instantly. I appreciated the styling; it was clear, with smooth colours, spherical edges, and easy transitions. Additionally, there isn’t a repetition of quotes. 

Winner: ChatGPT

7. Shade palette creator

After testing to-do lists, portfolios, and quote era, I wished to finish with slightly extra enjoyable: a shade palette generator. I requested GitHub Copilot and ChatGPT to design a webpage that generates random aesthetic shade palettes. 

VersionB7-ezgif.com-speed

GitHub Copilot’s shade palette was extra monochrome than simply random colours. This gave its output a way of concord as if the colours belonged to a theme or model board fairly than a very random set. The background was additionally a relaxing inexperienced; the additional particulars made it really feel extra like a completed device than a demo.

VersionA7-ezgif.com-speed

ChatGPT’s 5 shade swatches regarded good. Every swatch had its HEX code clearly displayed, and clicking one immediately triggered a slick affirmation message — “#HEX copied!” — that appeared on the middle of the web page. It’s nice for fast use or displaying a buddy. 

Winner: GitHub Copilot 

Right here’s a desk displaying which chatbot received the duties.  

Job Winner Why it received
To-do listing net app GitHub Copilot  Clear construction with separate information made it simpler to handle and scale.

Private portfolio
touchdown web page

ChatGPT ChatGPT included all key sections like mission playing cards and labored completely out of the field.
JavaScript logical error ChatGPT ChatGPT’s clear and concise explanations made the repair straightforward for a newbie to know.
Search algorithm Github Copilot GitHub Copilot has the identical right logic however is extra compact and simpler to reference.
Climate dashboard Cut up ChatGPT was fast to arrange and labored immediately; GitHub Copilot supplied a cleaner construction and a extra polished design for future edits. 
Inspirational quote generator ChatGPT ChatGPT confirmed a quote immediately with no repeats, and it felt extra polished and satisfying.
Shade palette creator Github Copilot Github Copilot’s monochrome shade palette has an expert format that feels extra like a completed device. 

Key insights on GitHub Copilot vs. ChatGPT from G2 Information

I additionally checked out evaluation knowledge on G2 to search out strengths and adoption patterns for GitHub Copilot and ChatGPT. Here is what stood out:

Satisfaction scores:

  • GitHub Copilot ranks excessive in product path (9.9), ease of setup (9.3), and ease of doing enterprise (9.2).
  • ChatGPT excels in ease of use (9.6), ease of setup (9.6), and ease of doing enterprise (9.5).

High industries represented:

  • GitHub Copilot has a stronger presence in laptop software program, IT, monetary companies, laptop and community safety, and telecommunications.
  • ChatGPT dominates laptop software program, IT companies, advertising, monetary companies, and training administration.

Highest-rated options:

  • GitHub Copilot stands out for code high quality (88%), documentation (88%), enter processing (87%), and interface (86%).
  • ChatGPT excels in interface (94%), person interplay studying (90%), understanding (90%), and pure dialog (90%).

Lowest-rated options:

  • GitHub Copilot struggles with updating schedule (84%), neighborhood (84%), and accuracy (85%).
  • ChatGPT struggles with knowledge safety (82%), error studying (83%), content material accuracy (83%), and neighborhood (83%).

Continuously requested questions on GitHub Copilot and ChatGPT

Received extra questions? Get the solutions right here!

Q1. GitHub Copilot vs. ChatGPT: Which is best?

It boils right down to what you want. When you spend most of your time writing code inside an editor and wish instantaneous inline strategies, then GitHub Copilot is your device. However if you’re juggling the whole lot from brainstorming to documentation to debugging explanations, ChatGPT is extra of an all-rounder. 

Q2. GitHub Copilot vs. ChatGPT: Which one ought to I purchase for coding functions?

GitHub Copilot (Particular person) is $10/month and provides limitless code completions, chat options, and premium mannequin entry. It really works completely with VS Code, JetBrains, and many others. ChatGPT prices $20/month and unlocks GPT-4, which supplies sooner responses, plugins, file uploads, picture/audio help, and code assist. 

Q3. Can GitHub Copilot generate documentation or feedback for my code?

Sure! GitHub Copilot can recommend feedback and documentation based mostly in your code or prompts, serving to you write extra exact explanations and enhance code readability.

This autumn. What is best for fixing or writing code? GitHub Copilot vs. ChatGPT?

GitHub Copilot shines with one-line or whole-function strategies as you kind. ChatGPT’s conversational type allows you to paste error messages or snippets and get step-by-step explanations or rewrite strategies.

Q5. Is GitHub Copilot free?

GitHub Copilot gives a free trial however requires a paid subscription for continued use. There are free choices for verified college students and trainers of standard open-source tasks.

Q6. Methods to use GitHub Copilot?

Set up the GitHub Copilot extensions in your code editor (like Visible Studio Code), register along with your GitHub Copilot account, and begin coding. Copilot will recommend completions and snippets as you kind.

Q7. GitHub Copilot vs. ChatGPT: Which has higher integration?

GitHub Copilot is native to main IDEs like VS Code, Visible Studio, JetBrains, and Neovim. GitHub.com strategies drop proper into your editor; you need not do any additional setup as soon as you put in the plugin. ChatGPT hooks in by way of neighborhood or official extensions, nevertheless it feels extra like a side-panel chat than built-in.  

Q8. Can I take advantage of each GitHub Copilot and ChatGPT?

Completely. Many builders maintain Copilot within the editor for dwell completions and open ChatGPT for extra profound questions.

Q9. GitHub Copilot vs. ChatGPT: Which is greatest for primary coders to study?

Copilot assumes that you just already know what you might be doing, and it is aware of the place to drop code and what you need subsequent, which might be opaque if you’re nonetheless studying the ropes. Freshmen typically discover ChatGPT extra approachable due to its pure language Q&A mode, which appears like asking a tutor. 

Q10. Methods to use GitHub Copilot in Visible Studio?

To make use of GitHub Copilot in Visible Studio, first, set up the GitHub Copilot extension from Visible Studio Market. Then, register along with your GitHub Copilot account, and you’ll begin getting AI-powered code strategies as you kind. You’ll be able to settle for, reject, or modify the strategies simply inside your editor.

Q11. Can GitHub Copilot substitute ChatGPT?

No, not wholly; GitHub Coiplot focuses on code era and strategies inside your editor. ChatGPT gives broader conversational skills, together with explaining ideas, writing code snippets, debugging assist, and normal problem-solving. They complement fairly than substitute one another.

Q12. GitHub Copilot vs. ChatGPT: How do they differ in performance?

GitHub Copilot is AI-driven code completion and refactoring inside your IDE. Suppose “autocomplete on steroids” plus a mini chat for fast code tweaks. ChatGPT is a conversational AI that may generate and clarify code, draft emails, write checks, analyze knowledge, brainstorm, and mainly do something text-oriented, not simply code.

GitHub Copilot vs. ChatGPT: My closing verdict

After testing seven real-world samples, I discovered that GitHub Copilot excelled in three duties, whereas ChatGPT got here forward in one other three. One activity confirmed blended outcomes the place each instruments carried out comparably.  These instruments excel in numerous methods for several types of coders. GitHub Copilot stood out when it got here to duties requiring clear file separation, modular code construction, and being developer-friendly. In case you are coding inside an IDE and on the lookout for a quiet, sharp AI companion that enhances your workflow, GitHub Copilot is your device. 

ChatGPT, then again, shone in fast wins, particularly for rookies. It typically felt extra instantly rewarding. It delivered satisfying outcomes with minimal setup, which made it really feel extra approachable. Use ChatGPT if you’re early in your coding journey and wish one thing shortly that works now with no setup stress.

And truthfully? The actual energy comes from utilizing each collectively. As a result of on this AI-ruling world, the very best coder just isn’t the one who simply picks one device, however the one who is aware of the right way to wield the strengths of each. 

Whether or not you are debugging code or brainstorming product concepts, the appropriate AI chatbot can rework how you’re employed. Discover the very best AI chatbots software program on G2!



Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles