I Reviewed 8 Finest Applicant Monitoring Techniques for 2025

The extra time I’ve spent working alongside HR groups, the extra I notice hiring is rather a lot like advertising and marketing. You’ll want to entice the appropriate viewers (candidates), nurture them via a pipeline (interview course of), and finally convert them into loyal model advocates (staff).

However identical to advertising and marketing, the method rapidly falls aside with out the appropriate instruments (resumes slip via the cracks, communication breaks down, and high expertise strikes on).

That’s why I needed to take a more in-depth have a look at G2’s finest applicant monitoring programs (ATS). I used to be particularly targeted on discovering in style applicant monitoring options for HR groups, as a result of that’s the place many of the real-world hiring struggles I’ve seen are inclined to occur. 

These platforms promise to assist recruiters and expertise groups keep organized, automate repetitive duties, and make hiring seamless. However which of them truly ship?

Whether or not you’re working a tech startup, a fast-scaling firm, or a mid-sized group, these are among the high rated ATS for fast-growing tech corporations that stood out throughout my analysis.

After evaluating over 25 instruments, listed here are the eight finest ATS platforms that may rework your hiring. Let’s get into it!

What units the very best ATS aside? Right here’s what I discovered

Hiring isn’t nearly discovering the appropriate individuals; it’s about managing all the course of with out dropping momentum. A sluggish or clunky ATS system can value you high expertise, which is why selecting the very best ATS software program is a giant deal for recruiters and HR groups. That’s true whether or not you’re making an attempt to determine which firm provides the very best applicant monitoring system or simply want a easy device that received’t sluggish your staff down.

It’s no shock then that 97.8% of Fortune 500 firms use an ATS in 2025 to maintain their hiring pipelines organized. With out one, even the most important groups wrestle to handle quantity effectively.

However not all applicant monitoring programs get it proper. Some show you how to observe candidates, schedule interviews, and preserve hiring managers in sync. Others? They make issues more durable than they have to be.

I reviewed the very best ATS choices to search out those that supply every part, from automated resume screening to customized hiring workflows, and these instruments stood out for all the appropriate causes.

My standards for selecting the right ATS

The typical recruiter is liable for about 30 hires monthly, a heavy workload that makes automation and usefulness essential. To place the funnel in perspective: the typical function attracts 73 candidates, simply 3 are interviewed, and just one receives a suggestion. The very best ATS platforms assist recruiters zero in on these high candidates quicker, with out dropping observe of the remainder

That’s why I targeted on platforms that cut back guide effort and scale with demand. I thought-about the next elements when evaluating the very best applicant monitoring programs.

• Intuitive candidate monitoring: A very good ATS system ought to make it simple to trace candidates at each stage, from preliminary utility to last provide. I checked out how effectively every platform organizes candidate pipelines, how simple it’s to maneuver candidates via hiring phases, and whether or not the system supplies clear, real-time standing updates. For firms hiring in tech, particularly software program and improvement roles, I regarded carefully at platforms that would work as the very best ATS app for recruiting within the software program trade, the place candidate pipelines transfer quick.
• Automation that saves time: Recruiters and HR groups juggle numerous duties, so the very best ATS reduces guide work. I prioritized platforms that supply automated resume screening, interview scheduling, follow-up emails, and job posting distribution. A couple of platforms even mix automation and full-suite HR instruments, providing among the finest recruiting software program with built-in ATS for groups making an attempt to simplify hiring with out sacrificing management.
• Integrations with HR and recruiting instruments: An ATS shouldn’t work in isolation. It ought to join with present instruments to create a easy hiring expertise. I targeted on platforms that combine effectively with HRIS, payroll programs, background test suppliers, job boards, and communication instruments like Slack and Gmail. I additionally evaluated how effectively every platform handles integrations for service industries particularly, since lots of the main applicant monitoring programs for service firms want versatile workflows throughout totally different departments.
• Customizable hiring workflows: Each firm has a unique hiring course of, so a one-size-fits-all applicant monitoring software program doesn’t reduce it. I regarded for platforms that permit HR groups to customise pipelines, add screening steps, arrange automated approvals, and create hiring scorecards to align with their recruitment wants. Instruments that pressure inflexible workflows didn’t make the reduce.
• Collaboration options: Hiring entails recruiters, hiring managers, and interview panels working collectively. Your ATS software program ought to make collaboration simple with shared candidate notes, interview suggestions varieties, and centralized communication so everybody stays on the identical web page.
• Compliance and information safety: Recruiting comes with strict authorized necessities, from EEO and GDPR compliance to information safety legal guidelines. I checked whether or not every ATS system consists of built-in compliance monitoring, role-based entry controls, and safe storage for delicate candidate data.
• Reporting and analytics: I prioritized platforms that supply detailed hiring experiences, variety metrics, and time-to-fill analytics. Good software program helps you measure what’s working, the place bottlenecks are, and find out how to enhance recruitment methods over time. Stable reporting can be essential for startups determining what is the high ATS software program for tech startups as they construct out hiring processes for the primary time

Via all of this, I saved circling again to at least one core query I’ve heard from so many groups I’ve labored with: what’s the finest applicant monitoring system for small companies that retains issues easy, helps hiring managers keep organized, and doesn’t require an enormous studying curve?

After breaking down every platform’s strengths, weaknesses, and key options, I’ve pulled collectively a listing that caters to a number of wants and use instances.

The checklist beneath incorporates real consumer evaluations from the applicant monitoring software program class web page. To be included on this class, an answer should:

• Accumulate, kind, and display resumes and any related candidate data
• Handle expertise swimming pools inside a customized workflow
• Allow communication between HR personnel, hiring supervisor, or recruiter and candidate

*This information was pulled from G2 in 2025. Some evaluations could have been edited for readability.

Primarily based on my evaluation of G2 consumer suggestions, Greenhouse simplifies recruitment workflows with instruments for candidate monitoring, staff collaboration, and seamless integrations with varied HR software program.

One function that I regularly see getting a variety of reward is ease of use. Customers typically spotlight the clear and logically structured interface, which makes navigation simple for hiring managers and recruiters. Monitoring candidates via totally different hiring phases feels seamless, with essential data readily accessible. Many G2 reviewers respect the system’s potential to facilitate collaboration by permitting a number of staff members to depart structured suggestions with out cluttering the method.

One other standout functionality, in line with customers, is sturdy integrations. Greenhouse integrates with all kinds of HR instruments, starting from background test suppliers to scheduling software program. G2 reviewers constantly point out that the mixing course of is easy, with out requiring extreme configurations or workarounds. This makes Greenhouse a great selection for firms that depend on a number of instruments for various elements of the recruitment course of.

A generally appreciated factor is reporting and analytics. Greenhouse’s customizable experiences present deep insights into hiring traits, recruiter efficiency, and candidate pipelines. From my evaluation of G2 consumer suggestions, many customers worth the clear, data-driven metrics that assist enhance recruitment methods over time. Whether or not it is for a fast overview or extra detailed experiences, customers word that the system makes it simple to drag the numbers they want.

Nevertheless, customization tends to obtain blended suggestions. Some G2 customers really feel that whereas Greenhouse covers all of the important options, it lacks flexibility in areas like workflows and automatic actions. I’ve seen that for groups on the lookout for a totally tailor-made ATS, this could be a limitation, as they could must work throughout the platform’s present constraints.

Moreover, candidate administration is a degree of frustration for some customers. Whereas the system does a very good job of protecting candidates organized, managing extra complicated hiring pipelines isn’t all the time easy. A number of reviewers point out that the search and filtering features could possibly be improved, particularly when coping with giant applicant swimming pools.

That mentioned, Greenhouse continues to be one of the broadly trusted ATS platforms, particularly for bigger groups that want construction and scalability. With a G2 ranking of 4.4 out of 5, it earns constant reward for its usability, integrations, and skill to maintain hiring workflows on observe.

What I dislike about Greenhouse:

• I’ve come throughout suggestions mentioning that customization choices for workflows and automations really feel a bit restrictive, with customers wishing for extra flexibility to tailor hiring processes to particular wants.
• Managing candidates throughout a number of roles or complicated hiring wants appears to be a problem, as looking out and filtering via giant volumes of candidates isn’t as refined as many customers anticipate.

What G2 customers dislike about Greenhouse:

“Trying to find candidates within the resume database is Greenhouse’s best weak spot. Whereas you are able to do a Boolean search and use filters, the displayed outcomes aren’t notably useful. In the event that they added AI with pure language search, it could vastly enhance the expertise. Moreover, the workflow for reviewing candidates is to have a look at one resume at a time and both reject or advance them. It will be higher to slender down the checklist of candidates being reviewed earlier than going via this course of.”

– Greenhouse Assessment, Invoice B.

From my evaluation of G2 consumer suggestions, BambooHR  provides a complete suite of HR instruments designed to streamline hiring and worker administration. It encompasses a user-friendly interface, a devoted cellular app for on-the-go entry, and an ATS that simplifies the recruitment course of.

One function that I regularly see getting a variety of reward is cellular accessibility. G2 customers respect how the cellular app permits staff to test schedules, request break day, and keep up to date with no need a desktop. Many reviewers point out that this comfort of accessing HR instruments anytime, wherever, considerably enhances every day operations.

One other generally appreciated factor is BambooHR’s applicant monitoring system (ATS). Customers spotlight its potential to simplify resume screening, observe candidate progress, and schedule interviews. In accordance with suggestions I gathered, reviewers worth the way it organizes applicant information effectively, decreasing the necessity for guide monitoring. That is notably helpful for hiring groups searching for a simple, well-structured ATS answer.

By way of ease of use, BambooHR’s user-friendly interface stands out in evaluations. Many G2 customers respect how the platform makes navigation easy, even for non-tech-savvy people. The logical menu design and clear structure are constantly praised for making it simple to handle worker data or generate HR experiences.

On the draw back, chat assist tends to obtain some blended suggestions. A number of G2 customers point out that when going through technical difficulties or pressing queries, counting on e mail or cellphone assist slows down the decision course of. 

Moreover, reporting and dashboard capabilities are sometimes identified as a limitation. I’ve seen G2 customers word points with BambooHR’s fundamental analytics, noting that experiences lack depth. A number of evaluations point out that the restricted customization choices make it troublesome to generate extremely particular insights, which might hinder data-driven decision-making.

BambooHR stays a favourite for HR groups that worth simplicity and seamless onboarding. With a G2 ranking of 4.4 out of 5, it’s praised for its user-friendly design and all-in-one HR performance.

What I dislike about BambooHR:

• I’ve seen some customers categorical frustration with the real-time chat assist function, as there are gaps that may make it more durable to get fast solutions when wanted, typically forcing reliance on slower e mail or cellphone assist.
• Reporting capabilities are regularly talked about as restricted, with many customers discovering the customization choices restrictive when producing detailed analytics.

What G2 customers dislike about BambooHR:

“My largest grievance about BambooHR is once I obtain e mail replies from Buyer Assist, they do not embrace my authentic e mail to them. I am a busy individual, as most HR professionals are, and if an excessive amount of time goes by earlier than I get a reply, I generally overlook precisely what I wanted assist with. I actually cannot consider any complaints I’ve with the BambooHR system itself.”

– BambooHR Assessment, Sandy Ok.

Primarily based on my evaluation of G2 consumer suggestions, JobDiva is acknowledged for integrating AI-powered options with sturdy information administration capabilities, serving to recruiters streamline sourcing, hiring, and monitoring candidates whereas sustaining a centralized database.

One function that I see getting a variety of reward is AI-powered candidate matching. The platform’s algorithm scans resumes and job descriptions to recommend high candidates, considerably decreasing guide search time. From the suggestions I gathered from G2 customers, many respect how this automation permits recruiters to concentrate on participating with appropriate candidates, saving them hours of sifting via functions.

One other standout functionality, in line with customers, is centralized information administration. JobDiva centralizes all recruitment information, together with candidate historical past, job particulars, and communication logs, making it simpler for customers to trace hiring progress and revisit previous interactions. I’ve seen that G2 reviewers regularly spotlight the system’s structured strategy to organizing recruitment information, which ensures that vital particulars are simply accessible and never misplaced within the course of.

Some customers have additionally highlighted JobDiva’s buyer assist as a serious energy. A number of G2 evaluations point out that the assist staff is responsive and useful, resolving each minor and extra complicated points effectively. This stage of assist is a generally appreciated factor for recruiters who depend on seamless platform efficiency.

On the flip aspect, sluggish loading occasions are a recurring theme within the G2 evaluations. Some customers discover sure pages take longer to load than anticipated, which might change into a bottleneck when working below tight deadlines.

Moreover, occasional lag and glitches have been identified in a number of G2 evaluations. Customers have talked about that navigating particular options can generally end in delays or minor bugs, which require refreshing the web page. Whereas this isn’t thought-about a dealbreaker, I’ve seen that these points can hinder effectivity, particularly for customers managing a number of candidates without delay.

Nonetheless, JobDiva shines with its AI-driven candidate matching and centralized information administration. Holding a powerful G2 ranking of 4.7 out of 5, it’s typically considered one of the highly effective ATS options for staffing companies and high-volume hiring.

What I dislike about JobDiva:

• I’ve seen that sluggish web page loading can generally be a difficulty, with delays when navigating between sections, which may be irritating throughout busy duties.
• I’ve skilled occasional lags or glitches on the platform, which may be disruptive, particularly when managing a number of candidates without delay.

What G2 customers dislike about JobDiva:

“When coping with a lot of information, generally it turns into somewhat bit sluggish, or the positioning will get down, particularly in the course of the peak time.”

– JobDiva Assessment, Sumit Ok.

From my evaluation of G2 consumer suggestions, Ceipal ATS is broadly appreciated for its ease of use. Many G2 customers spotlight how intuitive the interface is, making it simple to navigate between totally different recruitment features. Whether or not customers are looking for candidates or managing job postings, the platform’s simplicity eliminates the necessity for in depth coaching, permitting recruiters to concentrate on hiring duties somewhat than mastering complicated software program.

One other function that G2 customers constantly reward is resume parsing. The platform successfully extracts key particulars from resumes and robotically organizes them into structured profiles. In accordance with suggestions, this function is a major time-saver, decreasing guide information entry and making certain that candidate data is constantly formatted, which improves the effectiveness of searches.

Candidate database group additionally receives optimistic suggestions. The flexibility to retailer, search, and retrieve candidate profiles effectively is a generally appreciated side. Reviewers point out how having all candidate data in a single place streamlines their workflow and reduces administrative duties, permitting recruiters to concentrate on engagement.

Nevertheless, I’ve seen some customers categorical points with efficiency pace on G2. Some reviewers point out that processes like loading candidate profiles or working searches can take longer than anticipated. Whereas these delays aren’t a dealbreaker for many, they will change into disruptive when working below tight deadlines.

One other level of suggestions I’ve come throughout on G2 is the restricted customization choices. Whereas Ceipal ATS covers the core recruitment wants, some G2 customers word that the power to tailor workflows, experiences, and search parameters is considerably restricted. This could possibly be a difficulty for groups that require extra flexibility to adapt the platform to particular wants.

Nonetheless, Ceipal ATS constantly impresses with its intuitive interface and superior resume parsing. Its G2 ranking of 4.6 out of 5reflects sturdy consumer satisfaction, particularly for recruiters managing giant applicant swimming pools.

What I dislike about Ceipal ATS:

• I’ve come throughout suggestions mentioning that the platform may be sluggish at occasions, particularly when looking for candidates or loading profiles, with customers sometimes having to attend longer than anticipated for outcomes.
• Many customers, together with myself, really feel that customization choices are considerably restricted, notably in the case of experiences and workflow changes, with a want for extra flexibility to tailor the system to particular wants.

What G2 customers dislike about Ceipal ATS:

“Typically the system runs slowly, inflicting delays in importing profiles. Moreover, I’m unsure about find out how to contact buyer assist if I encounter any technical points or errors with Ceipal ATS.”

– Ceipal ATS Assessment, Dhivyashree J.

From my evaluation of G2 consumer suggestions, Lever is very regarded for its integrations, that are seen as considered one of its largest benefits. Many G2 customers spotlight how seamlessly the platform connects with key recruitment instruments like LinkedIn RSC, enabling them to trace outreach and sync notes with out guide intervention. Moreover, the Knowledge Explorer add-on is regularly praised for enhancing reporting capabilities, permitting customers to generate customized insights with ease.

One other standout function that I see getting a variety of reward is ease of implementation. G2 customers constantly point out how easy the onboarding course of is. The setup is described as easy, and lots of reviewers word the proactive function performed by buyer assist in making certain they had been up and working rapidly. The low want for in depth coaching throughout setup can be appreciated by a number of customers.

Usability is one other space the place Lever receives optimistic suggestions. Many reviewers point out how the clear, fashionable interface makes navigation simple, which simplifies managing job postings, monitoring candidates, and reviewing experiences. Primarily based on suggestions, the low studying curve stands out as a notable profit, permitting new customers to get comfy with the system rapidly.

Nevertheless, I’ve come throughout issues round lag points. Some G2 customers level out that sure actions, like loading profiles or switching between views, can really feel sluggish at occasions. Though these delays aren’t frequent, they will disrupt workflow at occasions.

One other level of suggestions that I’ve seen on G2 is the use of various terminology. Whereas this doesn’t have an effect on performance, some G2 customers discover it barely complicated in comparison with the usual ATS terminology they’re used to. This adjustment interval could make the platform really feel much less intuitive for some customers at first.

Even with occasional lag and a slight studying curve round terminology, Lever stands out for its fashionable design, integrations, and built-in CRM options. With a G2 ranking of 4.3 out of 5, it stays a well-liked selection for collaborative hiring groups.

What I dislike about Lever:

• Occasional lag within the system is one thing I’ve seen some customers point out, particularly when switching between sections or loading candidate profiles, which might decelerate the method.
• Terminology changes could be a hurdle, as I’ve personally discovered that it took a while to get used to sure phrases, particularly coming from a unique area.

What G2 customers dislike about Lever:

“There’s not a great way to pause a candidate’s progress, particularly when a job goes on maintain or will probably be delayed however you are still sourcing candidates.”

– Lever Assessment, Betsy Ok.

From my evaluation of G2 consumer suggestions, Zoho Recruit stands out for its customization capabilities. A constant theme in evaluations is the platform’s customization choices, which permit customers to switch modules and automate workflows. Many G2 reviewers spotlight how simple it’s to tailor recruitment processes to particular enterprise wants. This flexibility ensures that duties may be extra environment friendly and suited to every group’s distinctive workflow, with out counting on cumbersome workarounds.

I regularly see G2 reviewers point out recruitment administration as considered one of Zoho Recruit’s strengths. The platform centralizes candidate monitoring, interview scheduling, and collaboration, protecting each stage of the hiring course of. This reduces the necessity for exterior instruments, making it simpler to handle job postings and applicant progress. As soon as customers change into aware of the structure, many word how the system simplifies these duties.

A generally appreciated factor is buyer assist. Customers constantly reward Zoho Recruit’s assist staff for being responsive and useful. In accordance with suggestions from G2 customers, having fast help accessible is especially helpful in the course of the preliminary setup part, easing the transition and serving to customers navigate the platform with minimal frustration.

Nevertheless, primarily based on my evaluation of G2 consumer suggestions, I’ve seen some customers point out a studying curve. Whereas Zoho Recruit provides sturdy options, many G2 reviewers level out that getting comfy with all of the customization choices and settings takes time. New customers might have further onboarding earlier than they will absolutely make the most of the platform’s capabilities.

One other problem that regularly seems in G2 evaluations is integration inconsistencies. Whereas Zoho Recruit integrates with varied third-party instruments, some customers word that syncing with calendars or linking to different HR programs doesn’t all the time perform easily. These occasional hiccups typically require guide changes or workarounds, which might disrupt workflow effectivity.

Although the platform comes with a studying curve and occasional integration hiccups, Zoho Recruit is well-loved for its customization and automation capabilities. With a G2 ranking of 4.4 out of 5, it’s a flexible possibility for companies of all sizes, particularly small companies. 

What I dislike about Zoho Recruit:

• The system’s studying curve is one thing I’ve seen talked about by customers, because it took me a while to completely grasp all its options and customization settings.
• Integrations generally require further setup and changes, however as soon as configured correctly, I discovered that they labored effectively throughout the platform.

What G2 customers dislike about Zoho Recruit:

“Some extra superior options could require technical information, nevertheless new customers can begin with pre-configured templates to progressively be taught and discover the extra complicated options.”

– Zoho Recruit Assessment, Paul O.

Primarily based on my evaluation of G2 consumer suggestions, HRone is usually seen as a flexible answer for companies, providing a broad vary of HR instruments, from recruitment administration to payroll processing. A constant theme in evaluations is its intuitive interface, which is appreciated for minimizing the educational curve for brand new customers.

Many G2 reviewers spotlight how simple it’s to handle job postings, observe candidates, or deal with payroll, with the platform’s accessible structure making key features simple to find and decreasing time spent on administrative duties.

I’ve seen that the feature-rich platform is one other side G2 customers regularly reward. HRone provides an intensive suite of HR instruments, together with attendance monitoring and efficiency administration. Many customers respect how these varied features are built-in right into a single system, eliminating the necessity for a number of exterior instruments and making it simpler to handle end-to-end HR operations multi functional place.

One standout function that I see getting a variety of reward is payroll administration. Customers respect how the system automates payroll calculations, decreasing the chance of guide errors and making certain well timed wage processing. That is typically seen as a serious time-saver and a key profit for companies managing payroll on a big scale.

Nevertheless, I’ve come throughout some blended suggestions round efficiency pace. Some G2 customers point out that sure duties, reminiscent of loading experiences or switching between modules, can take longer than anticipated. Whereas these slowdowns should not constant, they will disrupt workflow effectivity, notably throughout busy durations when time is of the essence. 

I’ve additionally seen some customers categorical points with information deletion choices. There doesn’t appear to be a solution to completely delete sure information, which could possibly be a priority for firms with strict information retention insurance policies. Many customers recommend {that a} extra versatile strategy to information deletion and archival could be helpful, permitting companies to raised handle their historic data.

Irrespective of those minor hiccups, , HROne delivers a sturdy all-in-one HR suite that simplifies recruitment and payroll. Its spectacular G2 ranking of 4.8 out of 5 highlights sturdy consumer confidence and satisfaction.

What I dislike about HROne:

•  I’ve seen customers point out system pace, with some experiencing slowness when loading experiences or switching between totally different features.
• Knowledge administration flexibility could possibly be improved, as I’ve seen customers, together with myself, would respect extra management over managing and archiving sure data.

What G2 customers dislike about HROne:

“No customization is allowed within the profile part. It’s troublesome to create formulation for the pay parts and you can also’t share paperwork greater than 50 mb file dimension.”

– HROne Assessment, Gangaraju M.

From my evaluation of G2 consumer suggestions, Teamtailor is well known for serving to recruiters handle functions effectively whereas providing a optimistic candidate expertise. One of many standout options that G2 reviewers constantly spotlight is automation. Customers respect how the platform automates repetitive duties, reminiscent of candidate screening and follow-up emails, which helps preserve communication constant and ensures no candidate is missed. This protects recruiters time and permits them to focus extra on participating with candidates.

I regularly see G2 reviewers point out collaboration as a serious plus. The flexibility to share notes, tag staff members, and depart structured suggestions makes it simpler for hiring groups to work collectively throughout the platform. Many customers spotlight how this eliminates the necessity for scattered emails or exterior messaging apps, streamlining communication and fostering smoother collaboration between hiring managers and recruiters.

One function that G2 customers actually respect is branding capabilities. Teamtailor’s profession web site builder permits firms to create an attractive careers web page with no need technical expertise. Reviewers typically reward the customization choices, which make it simple to align the profession web site with an organization’s employer model, enhancing the general candidate expertise.

Nevertheless, primarily based on my evaluation of G2 consumer suggestions, the cellular expertise wants enchancment. Whereas the desktop model is usually praised for its ease of use, many customers point out that navigating the platform on cellular units could possibly be extra seamless. Duties like reviewing functions on the go may be extra cumbersome because of the lack of cellular optimization, which some customers discover inconvenient.

Moreover, I’ve come throughout evaluations mentioning occasional glitches. Whereas not main dealbreakers, customers have identified points reminiscent of delays in loading candidate profiles or inconsistencies in CV parsing. These minor technical hiccups sometimes disrupt workflow and may gain advantage from additional enhancements to boost the platform’s general effectivity.

However Teamtailor wins recruiters over with branding capabilities and automation options that elevate the candidate expertise. With a G2 ranking of 4.6 out of 5, it’s acknowledged as a candidate-friendly ATS that scales with rising groups.

What I dislike about Teamtailor:

• The cellular model is not as easy because the desktop expertise, with some duties being more durable to finish on the go, in line with consumer suggestions.
• I’ve seen occasional glitches, reminiscent of slow-loading candidate profiles, which some customers point out as a minor frustration.

What G2 customers dislike about Teamtailor:

“My solely critique could be that to entry the transcription function, the interview must be recorded, which I discover a bit pricey. In consequence, I had to make use of Tactiq for transcription and note-taking as a substitute.”

– Teamtailor Assessment, Antonella S.

Discover this pricing information for applicant monitoring programs to grasp the important thing elements to think about when selecting ATS instruments.

Inquisitive about how your HR operations are performing? Discover HR analytics software program.

Harshita Tewari

Harshita is a Content material Advertising and marketing Specialist at G2. She holds a Grasp’s diploma in Biotechnology and has labored within the gross sales and advertising and marketing sector for meals tech and journey startups. At the moment, she makes a speciality of writing content material for the ERP persona, protecting subjects like vitality administration, IP administration, course of ERP, and vendor administration. In her free time, she may be discovered snuggled up together with her pets, writing poetry, or in the course of a Netflix binge.