Friday, June 20, 2025

What I Discovered After 30 Days of Use


I’ve been utilizing ChatGPT for analysis and rephrasing functions for 2 years now. In its preliminary part, the analysis was generic. However I discovered my very own strategy to benefit from it: I gave video transcripts as enter to assemble significant quotes from consultants. AI helped me with fast quotes that I can use in my writing. 

As ChatGPT advanced, its analysis began getting higher. At current, ChatGPT’s Deep Analysis is exceptionally correct because it provides hyperlinks to data sources that I can confirm if wanted. Nonetheless, it has its limits on the Free and Plus plans. I made a decision to seek out an alternate AI chatbot and in contrast Claude vs. ChatGPT

I began evaluating Anthropic’s Claude, not only for analysis but in addition for functions related to my function as a content material marketer. After spending some critical time with each platforms, I discovered that ChatGPT is nice for deep analysis and picture technology, whereas Claude is finest for inventive writing and coding. 

Inquisitive about my outcomes? Let’s dig into the analysis on it!

Claude does job of writing creatively, whereas ChatGPT exhibits respectable capabilities for researching and producing pictures. The selection between the 2 in the end converges into what’s the one factor you need the AI sidekick to automate, which saves a whole lot of your time. 

Claude vs. ChatGPT: Key variations and similarities

Earlier than we start the head-to-head testing, I would like you to look at the AI chatbot platforms and their options extra intently. They’re each spectacular, however the satan’s within the particulars, is not it? Let’s break them down and see what units them aside.

Claude vs. ChatGPT: What’s totally different?

Let’s speak specifics. Right here’s the place Claude and ChatGPT set themselves aside:

  • Accuracy: ChatGPT appears fairly correct in following the instructions given in a immediate. Nonetheless, when experimenting with picture technology, I discovered Claude hallucinating whereas following clear directions.
  • Content material technology: ChatGPT’s content material technology is pretty easy. Generally, it produces repetitive responses concerning content material structuring or makes use of repetitive, bland phrases. Though, when prompted to do in any other case, it listens. Claude provides an open method to set the type of its response whereas prompting, permitting customers to set the tone proactively and get related outcomes.
  • Customization: Claude affords methods to customise the interface, equivalent to selecting the colour mode and chat font. ChatGPT doesn’t supply such customization, particularly in terms of fonts, which may be essential for some folks.

Claude vs. ChatGPT: What’s related?

There are just a few similarities between Claude and ChatGPT, together with: 

  • Writing participating content material: Each Claude and ChatGPT enable customers to create participating content material based mostly on textual prompts. With subsequent prompts, one would possibly must refine the type and tone on ChatGPT. Alternatively, Claude permits you to set the tone whereas writing the immediate.
  • Availability of free plan: Each Claude and ChatGPT supply a free plan. On the free plan, you should use deep analysis in ChatGPT as much as 5 duties per person monthly. Claude’s deep analysis is presently being examined in beta. It may additionally be out there in a free plan as much as a particular restrict.
  • Interface: The 2 AI chatbots have a clear, superintuitive interface. Throughout onboarding, the platforms help you with various things you are able to do utilizing them. 

How I in contrast Claude vs. ChatGPT: my analysis standards

To ensure it was a good struggle, I used their free variations of Claude and ChatGPT, and examined them in analysis, writing and rephrasing, coding, and picture technology capabilities. 

I ensured full equity by utilizing similar prompts for each, with no modifications or changes, simply the identical questions all through. Lastly, I evaluated the response for its accuracy, creativity, and usefulness. 

I categorize an output as correct when the immediate’s response is as anticipated. The response’s engagement and construction displayed creativity. Lastly, the convenience of utilizing a response as is determines its usability. 

So as to add different person views, I additionally cross-checked my findings with G2 opinions to see how totally different customers expertise these fashions.

Disclaimer: AI responses might fluctuate based mostly on phrasing, session historical past, and system updates for a similar prompts. These outcomes mirror the fashions’ capabilities on the time of testing.

Claude Vs. ChatGPT: How they carried out in my exams

I explored each platforms in-depth, highlighting why sure options stand out and what they imply for actual customers. By testing every software, I uncovered its strengths and limitations for a transparent, hands-on comparability. Let’s get began!

Analysis capabilities

To check each instruments’ analysis capabilities, I examined them with the identical immediate, “Evaluate Claude and ChatGPT by way of analysis, writing, coding, and pricing. The aim is to analysis the 2 platforms.”

Claude gave me overview of the distinction between the 2 platforms in bullet factors for every functionality. Though this was useful, I doubted its credibility since no data sources had been talked about with it, the place I might confirm the details.

Claude gave me a high-level understanding of the variations, which helped me summarize. Nonetheless, this analysis wouldn’t assist a lot in making knowledgeable conclusions since verifying its accuracy was difficult. Claude’s Analysis continues to be in beta and is offered in only some areas, together with the US, Japan, and Brazil. 

ChatGPT, alternatively, has a Deep Analysis function in its free model. It supplies complete data on the variations between Claude and ChatGPT with dependable (and clickable) sources. This enables me to personally confirm the accuracy of the pointers I’d use to assemble my perspective on the 2 instruments.

chatgpt vs claude for research

Furthermore, you get an entire checklist of sources and citations that ChatGPT used as a reference for the analysis. This makes ChatGPT’s response extra credible than Claude’s. 

Based mostly on my expertise on the platform, I really feel ChatGPT does higher in analysis than Claude. 

Winner: ChatGPT

Writing and rephrasing

I in contrast Claude and ChatGPT based mostly on a immediate, “Write an off-the-cuff essay on AI taking on the world.” Claude gave me an choice to pick out the writing type whereas supplying the immediate. 

Claude’s response seemed to be extra participating than ChatGPT’s. Claude used a Terminator analogy to assist me visualize its writing. It used quick sentences to take care of higher readability and stored the tone conversational. 

claude for writing

Once I examined the identical immediate in ChatGPT, I used to be stunned to see the outcome. The context it units is best and extra fascinating than Claude’s. Nonetheless, the writing type is fairly bland. ChatGPT covers totally different angles of the subject whereas conveying its real-world influence. On the finish of its response, ChatGPT asks if a person would have a extra conversational or humorous tone. 

chatgpt for writing

Claude and ChatGPT are tied by way of writing. I examined the 2 platforms’ rephrasing capabilities to discover a clear winner. 

I gave them a immediate: “Edit this to rework it right into a dialog between two folks. Use first- and second-person narrative. Write in lively voice. Use a extra humorous tone.” 

claude for rewriting

Whereas rephrasing and enhancing the response, Claude does an excellent job of reworking the essay right into a dialogue. It suggests the feelings or actions an individual takes along with delivering their dialogue. You’ll be able to simply convert it right into a skit or a task play with out making a whole lot of edits.

ChatGPT did a good job of reworking this content material right into a dialogue. Nonetheless, the circulation and vocabulary weren’t nearly as good as Claude’s. Due to this fact, in terms of writing and rephrasing, Claude is a extra appropriate selection. 

Winner: Claude

Coding

I examined the coding capabilities of the 2 AI chatbot platforms based mostly on the immediate under.  

my coding prompt for comparing chatgpt and claude

I instructed the instruments to put in writing code for the homepage of DAYFIVE, a content material advertising and marketing companies firm. I briefly overviewed how I visualized the homepage, together with the required parts. 

I used to be amazed to see the outcome on each platforms. 

Anthropic’s Claude gave me a vibrant design. It delivered on the complicated request, the place I wished testimonials to slip horizontally on scrolling. Total, it gave me a code construction to work on to edit to make adjustments within the copy and graphics. 

website coding using claude

I used the identical immediate on ChatGPT. Nonetheless, it didn’t add horizontal motion to the testimonial. I used to be in a position to scroll by way of the testimonials manually. Total, I preferred Claude’s output higher than ChatGPT’s in terms of coding. 

Relating to performance, ChatGPT allowed me to rework the HTML5 code into JavaScript and numerous different languages. When it comes to flexibility, ChatGPT provided higher choices. 

website coding built using chatgpt

Based mostly on what I noticed, there’s a tie between Claude and ChatGPT for a coding use case.  A coding knowledgeable will be capable to see the variations extra clearly. 

Winner: Tie (each Claude and ChatGPT)

Picture technology

I examined the 2 AI chatbot instruments for his or her picture technology capabilities on the identical immediate. I requested the instruments to “Create a picture to depict a sundown with orange sky and an individual standing in the midst of a lush inexperienced panorama. The particular person writes with a feather and sketches the panorama of their pocket book.”

The winner stood out, and the output generated was manner higher than its counterpart. Right here’s what Claude generated as a response to the picture creation activity: 

image generation using claude

Claude didn’t do job by way of accuracy and visualization. 

ChatGPT generated an attractive image that was near expectations within the immediate. Right here’s ChatGPT’s output: 

image generation using chatgpt
In comparison with Claude, ChatGPT’s free plan creates higher pictures based mostly on a immediate. 

Winner: ChatGPT

Pricing

Each Claude and ChatGPT supply a free plan. Claude’s paid plans’ pricing is as follows:

  • Professional: $17/month
  • Max: $100/month
  • Staff: $25/month/member (minimal 5 members required)

claude pricing

ChatGPT’s pricing is considerably related, apart from just a few plan variations. ChatGPT’s paid plans value: 

  • Plus: $20/month
  • Professional: $200/month
  • Staff: $25/month/person

The ChatGPT workforce plan requires greater than 2 years and is billed yearly. 

Right here’s the overview of ChatGPT pricing plans: 

chatgpt pricing

ChatGPT fees somewhat greater than Claude in its mid-tier plan. Nonetheless, that is justified contemplating its superior analysis and picture technology capabilities. On the similar time, Claude affords respectable worth in writing and enhancing. I really feel it’s a tie between the 2 AI platforms in terms of pricing. 

Winner: Tie (each Claude and ChatGPT)

Claude vs. ChatGPT: Head-to-head comparability desk

Right here’s a desk displaying the net builder software program that wins.

Function and performance Winner Why it received
Analysis capabilities ChatGPT 🏆 ChatGPT received right here with its deep analysis functionality. Claude’s Analysis continues to be in its beta testing part.
Writing and rephrasing Claude 🏆 Claude provided a easy manner to decide on a writing type and ship extra participating content material. ChatGPT’s writing felt extra educational. 
Coding Tie  Claude delivered a extra visually interesting consequence with performance as anticipated within the immediate. ChatGPT provided extra flexibility in remodeling code into totally different languages.
Picture Era ChatGPT 🏆 ChatGPT was in a position to create the picture as anticipated within the immediate. Claude confirmed hallucinations. 
Pricing Tie ChatGPT is barely costly however justifies it with its accuracy, analysis capabilities, and picture creation proficiency. Claude does job of writing and rephrasing. 

Key insights on Claude vs. ChatGPT from G2 information

I checked out overview information on G2 based mostly on actual customers’ experiences to seek out strengths and adoption patterns for Claude and ChatGPT. This is what stood out:

Satisfaction rankings

  • Claude excels in ease of use (97%), ease of setup (96%), and ease of doing enterprise (94%).
  • ChatGPT ranks excessive in ease of use (94%). Nonetheless, it exhibits respectable satisfaction rankings for ease of doing enterprise (94%) and ease of setup (94%). 

Industries used

  • Claude dominates in IT and companies, laptop software program, advertising and marketing and promoting, monetary companies, and better schooling.
  • ChatGPT has a powerful presence in IT and companies, laptop software program, advertising and marketing and promoting, monetary companies, and consulting. 

Highest-rated options

  • Claude excels in understanding(92%), pure dialog (91%), and person interplay studying (91%).
  • ChatGPT stands out for pure dialog (93%), creativity (90%), and understanding (89%). 

Lowest-rated options

  • Claude struggles with information safety (85%), content material accuracy (85%), and studying (85%).
  • ChatGPT additionally struggles with error studying (78%), software program integration (81%), and API flexibility (82%). 

Steadily requested questions on Claude vs. ChatGPT

Have extra questions? Discover extra solutions under.

Q1. What’s the information cutoff for Claude? 

Presently, Claude 3 (Anthropic’s newest household of AI fashions, together with Claude 3 Opus, Sonnet, and Haiku) has a information cutoff of August 2023.

Which means it was educated on information out there up till that time and doesn’t have built-in consciousness of occasions or developments after that date until up to date by way of exterior instruments or plugins.

Q2. What’s the information cutoff for ChatGPT?  

As of Might 2025, the information cut-off for ChatGPT (GPT-4-turbo) is October 2023.

This implies the mannequin was educated on information out there as much as that date and does not have information of occasions or developments after October 2023 until accessed by way of instruments like internet searching.

Q3. Why do folks like Claude AI? 

Individuals like Claude for coding and reasoning. Right here’s what Amir, a G2’s validated reviewer,  feedback on why they like Claude: 

“Claude AI is great for coding help, particularly with its clear and structured explanations. It supplies options and explains the logic, which helps me perceive complicated code and study as I am going. It’s additionally very responsive, making it really feel like a real-time coding associate. Furthermore, being able to prepare a number of information in parallel supplies a seamless expertise.”

Claude AI Evaluation, Amir S, Tech Lead and Technical Architect.

This autumn. Why do folks like ChatGPT? 

Individuals like ChatGPT for its picture creation and analysis capabilities. Right here’s what 
Shilpi, a G2’s validated reviewer, says about ChatGPT: 

“It is easy to make use of, and responses are quick. I exploit it quite a bit in my every day duties as a result of it could produce good-quality pictures, which I exploit in my PowerPoint. It is also internet and API pleasant. I additionally use it for code technology and debugging, so I can say the combination is comparatively easy. Total, I discovered it very simple and user-friendly.

ChatGPT Evaluation, Shilpi M, Embedded Software program Engineer.

Claude vs. ChatGPT: My ultimate verdict

Though I discovered Claude to be higher at writing, rephrasing, and code technology, I’ve second ideas about its reliability. Its responses in my testing of analysis and picture technology options make me query its accuracy in different use circumstances as effectively. 

ChatGPT did a good job for me when it got here to analysis and picture technology, particularly by way of accuracy. This elevated the reliability of the AI chatbot answer. It has its limits on the Free and Plus plans. Nonetheless, I’d need to take a look at different alternate options earlier than onboarding a brand new AI sidekick. 

If you wish to evaluate ChatGPT with different alternate options, try my colleague Soundarya’s weblog on Gemini vs. ChatGPT



Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles